Back to Top Skip to main content

Norovirus Outbreak in Army Service Members, Camp Arifjan, Kuwait, May 2018

Norovirus are a group of related, single-stranded RNA, nonenveloped viruses that cause acute gastroenteritis in humans. (Photo Courtesy: CDC/Charles D. Humphrey Norovirus are a group of related, single-stranded RNA, nonenveloped viruses that cause acute gastroenteritis in humans. (CDC photo by Charles D. Humphrey)

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

ABSTRACT

In May 2018, an outbreak of gastrointestinal illnesses due to norovirus occurred at Camp Arifjan, Kuwait. The outbreak lasted 14 days, and a total of 91 cases, of which 8 were laboratory confirmed and 83 were suspected, were identified. Because the cases occurred among a population of several thousand service members transiting through a crowded, congregate setting of open bays of up to 250 beds, shared bathrooms and showers, and large dining facilities, the risk of hundreds or thousands of cases was significant. The responsible preventive medicine authorities promptly recognized the potential threat and organized and monitored the comprehensive response that limited the spread of the illness and the duration of the outbreak. This report summarizes findings of the field investigation and the preventive medicine response conducted from 18 May–3 June 2018 at Camp Arifjan.

WHAT ARE THE NEW FINDINGS?    

Introduction of norovirus disease into a crowded, congregate setting of transient service members precipitated an outbreak of at least 91 recognized cases in a vulnerable population of thousands. Prompt actions to halt air traffic in and out of the base, to isolate and quarantine infected persons, and to restrict movement to separate the well from the sick aborted the outbreak.

WHAT IS THE IMPACT ON READINESS AND FORCE HEALTH PROTECTION?

Norovirus is the leading cause of gastrointestinal illnesses in military settings. The contagiousness of the virus and the short incubation period can result in high case counts in concentrated military populations whose mission readiness may be impaired by widespread illness and necessary control measures. Recognition of this illness should prompt rapid and vigorous countermeasures.

BACKGROUND

Norovirus is the leading cause of acute gastrointestinal (GI) illness outbreaks in military settings.1–7 Norovirus can be transmitted through person-to-person direct contact and exposure to contaminated food, water, aerosols, and fomites.7–9 Additionally, the virus is resistant to extreme temperatures and many standard disinfection methods.9 Following a short incubation period of 24–72 hours, symptoms, lasting 1 to 3 days, may include diarrhea, vomiting, nausea, and stomach pain. Patients recovering from a norovirus infection may shed the virus in their stool for up to 14 days, increasing the risk of secondary infection.7–9

Setting

Camp Arifjan, Kuwait, is the largest U.S. military base in the U.S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) and, at the time of the reported outbreak, accommodated over 10,000 service members from all branches of the U.S. military and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as well as Department of Defense (DoD) civilians and contractors. Camp Arifjan’s gateway serves as the hub for U.S. military and DoD personnel traveling throughout the Southwest Asian Theater. On a daily basis, a minimum of 1,000 personnel are transiting through Camp Arifjan’s gateway to return to the U.S. or to travel to other points within the USCENTCOM, making the area highly susceptible to the spread of infectious disease. At the time of the outbreak described in this report, there were approximately 14,000 service members at Camp Arifjan, of which about 3,000–4,000 were in transit and 10,000 were permanently assigned there.

For transient personnel awaiting transportation, separate housing and bathrooms are located within the gateway area; however, transients’ movements throughout the rest of Camp Arifjan are not restricted. Dining, laundry, recreation, and transportation facilities are shared between the transient and permanent populations. Housing comprises concrete buildings with beds located in open bays that can accommodate up to 250 people. Latrine and shower facilities are in separate trailers but are also used by those who work within the gateway area. Of the 35 buildings within the gateway, 5 are reserved for latrine/showers, 7 function as administrative offices for the gateway transportation and postal services, 7 serve as offices for the theater engineer brigade, and 16 operate as transient barracks.

Outbreak timeline

On 18 May at approximately 0800 hours, the 75th Combat Support Hospital emergency department (ED) evaluated a male active duty patient who presented with symptoms of nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. This patient had traveled from a classified country to Ali Al Salem Air Base and then to Camp Arifjan en route to redeploy to the U.S. The patient and his unit had slept outside while at Ali Al Salem and were there for less than 8 hours before traveling via bus to Camp Arifjan. During the 2-hour bus drive from Ali Al Salem to Camp Arifjan, with an estimated 30 other personnel on the bus, the patient vomited and soiled himself multiple times. Upon arriving in Camp Arifjan, the patient was transported by his unit directly from the bus to the ED. In the ED, after the patient was assessed and treated, a stool specimen was collected for clinical testing, and he was released to his unit into the transient barracks in building D2 at the gateway (Figure 1).

The 223rd Medical Detachment (Preventive Medicine [PM]) and the theater PM physician at the medical brigade were immediately notified of the patient, and an aliquot of the stool specimen was transferred to the PM laboratory for surveillance testing via the BioFire® FilmArray® GI panel. Norovirus, enteropathogenic Escherichia coli, and enteroaggregative E. coli were all detected in the stool specimen. The 223rd Medical Detachment microbiologist immediately notified the public health nurse stationed with the 75th Combat Support Hospital. Twenty minutes after receiving the results of the GI test, the detachment commander and the PM physician decided that the index patient was to be immediately readmitted to the hospital. Two hours after being initially discharged, the patient was readmitted to the hospital and put into isolation.

On 20 May, 2 additional cases presented with nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. One case tested positive for norovirus on the FilmArray® GI panel. This case was housed at the gateway in building B4. When interviewed, he reported that 1 of the soldiers who lived in building D2 was also sick. The other case could not produce a stool specimen for testing. Social media postings seen by the PM staff reported anecdotally that other soldiers were sick during this time, but no other soldiers presented to the hospital with GI symptoms, resulting in several days without patients.

On 23 May, an Army unit departed Kuwait and arrived at North Fort Hood, TX, the next day. The soldiers in the unit were not symptomatic upon their departure; however, during the course of the flight, a total of 21 soldiers exhibited symptoms consistent with norovirus, and 1 case was later laboratory confirmed. These 21 cases were not counted in the total case count from Camp Arifjan. All symptomatic soldiers were seen, treated, and released to quarters per the chief of PM at Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center in Fort Hood.

On 24 May, 3 patients presented with norovirus symptoms at the ED at Camp Arifjan; all patients were confirmed positive for norovirus with the BioFire® FilmArray®. On 25 May, a medic arrived at 0500 to the ED to request Imodium® for soldiers in his unit who were sick and were scheduled to redeploy home that day. Throughout the day, 12 patients presented to the ED and clinic with symptoms consistent with norovirus illness, and an outbreak was officially declared by the medical brigade commander, who notified the installation commander of Camp Arifjan. Based upon the recommendation of the theater PM physician, the command authorities and the Air Force agreed to halt flights coming in and out of Camp Arifjan. The flight leaving for Fort Hood mentioned above had departed Camp Arifjan before flights were halted; however, no other flights departed Camp Arifjan until the outbreak had resolved, and Fort Hood reported this incident and response to the Disease Reporting System internet on 30 May. All new cases presenting with symptoms consistent with norovirus were assumed to be part of this outbreak unless proven otherwise. Over the course of 14 days, a total of 91 cases experienced symptoms of nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and/or abdominal pain while at Camp Arifjan.

METHODS

All cases were symptomatically identified. The BioFire® system was used for presumptive testing during the outbreaks in theater. Testing via the BioFire® system was suspended once norovirus was identified in the first 8 cases and thus determined to be the cause of the outbreak. BioFire® testing began again at the end of the outbreak to separate those patients without norovirus to preclude them from the quarantine area in an effort to prevent them from acquiring a nosocomial illness.

For the epidemiologic investigation described here, a confirmed case of norovirus was defined as a patient at Camp Arifjan from 18–31 May who experienced nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, or abdominal cramps and whose stool specimen tested positive for norovirus via polymerase chain reaction using the FilmArray® GI Panel for norovirus. A suspected case was defined as a patient having any of the same symptoms as a confirmed case but whose stool sample was not tested. After the index case, individuals who had experienced symptoms outside of Camp Arifjan, including the aforementioned soldiers who traveled to Fort Hood, were not included in the overall case count.

RESULTS

From 18–31 May 2018, a total of 91 cases (8 confirmed and 83 suspected) of norovirus were found in Camp Arifjan, Kuwait (Figure 2). Two symptomatic cases (1 confirmed and 1 suspected) did not have a recorded onset date.

The most common symptoms reported by patients were diarrhea, vomiting, nausea (Table). Most cases were among men (84%) and among junior enlisted (48%) and senior enlisted (35%) personnel (Table). Six cases (6%) had been previously deployed in neighboring countries and had been in Kuwait for fewer than 4 days before their illness onset date. Twelve cases (13%) belonged to 1 unit, which had the highest concentration of cases in any single unit. Attack rates by unit were not available.

Confirmed and suspect cases were symptomatic for 1 day on average (range: 1–4 days). The index case and the last known case were both hospitalized, primarily for isolation purposes. The last hospitalized case was moved from the barracks to the hospital to allow the barracks to be cleaned and opened to house other service members again.

Countermeasures

On 18 May, PM made initial recommendations to the gateway staff to limit the number of new service members placed in building D2. The staff refused because of overcrowding and the need to place service members in beds. However, in the effort to reduce the spread of infection, signs were placed that evening by the 223rd Detachment team on building D2 and the closest men's bathroom. It was later ascertained through patient interviews that the precautions on these signs were generally ignored.

On the evening of 18 May, PM specialists were sent to observe cleaning contractors while latrines were being disinfected and to oversee the cleaning dilution used. The cleaning contractors were directly observed using toilet water to mop and clean the bathroom sinks. On 19 May, PM notified the base contracting officers about the unsanitary cleaning practices and the potential of an upcoming norovirus outbreak, emphasizing how improper cleaning practices exacerbate the spread of disease. No changes were made to the cleaning schedule to disinfect those sinks until after the outbreak had started.

Daily briefings were held to keep all healthcare providers, medics, and cleaning teams informed. These briefings provided information to help facilitate the plan for the next 12–24 hours, including a reminder of the cleaning protocols and updates on the status of housing, food, the cleaning of latrines, and the numbers of service members who were quarantined, cleared, or with active symptoms.

On 25 May, at the recommendation of the theater PM physician, all flights departing Kuwait were halted and a 72-hour quarantine at the gateway was initiated. An incident commander worked closely with base stakeholders to ensure infection control measures were implemented while medical care, security, food, and other accommodations were provided for the more than 1,200 personnel housed in the quarantine area, which included the 30 buildings shown in Figure 1. Building D2 was designated the isolation building for all newly identified sick cases. That building was chosen to isolate symptomatic patients because the index case originally slept there and all service members residing in that building had potentially been exposed. The building was also chosen because it was closest to the latrine that had already been used by several confirmed cases.

The same day, the theater PM physician recommended a tiered approach to isolation and quarantine in an effort to control the spread of disease by placing all service members into 4 groups. Group 1 consisted of symptomatic cases who were isolated in building D2. Group 2 comprised those recovering from GI illness who were isolated in another building for an additional 24 hours after symptoms resolved. Group 3 included exposed service members who had not exhibited any symptoms but were being contained in the D and E blocks during the length of the incubation period (72 hours). Group 4 was composed of others in the general population who never exhibited symptoms and were not knowingly exposed to the ill population. Groups 1–3 remained inside the quarantine area, and most were released by 29 May. Service members in group 4 were free to move throughout Camp Arifjan but were restricted from entering the quarantine area. Barricade tape sectioned off the approximately 300 yard perimeter, and military police secured the perimeter to prevent service members from entering or leaving the quarantine zone.

On 28 May, survey forms (Figure 3) were developed to expedite the screening process for medically clearing service members. Providers and medics were recruited from the quarantined units to assist with administering the survey in the quarantined area. The form was designed to be cut in half so that service members could keep a copy and use it as their ticket to leave the quarantined area and move freely within Camp Arifjan if they had been medically cleared to do so. Two healthcare providers, 20 medics, and 1 public health nurse administered the surveys to the service members who were billeted in the quarantine buildings. Two PM technicians were assigned to each row of quarantined buildings. PM technicians and the public health nurse instructed cleaning teams in each building on the mixing of bleach solution and proper cleaning procedures, according to guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. All personnel were medically evaluated and all buildings were sanitized by 2300 on May 28. At 2400 that evening, the quarantine area was reduced to building D2, where sick personnel remained, and to specified bathrooms.

EDITORIAL COMMENT

The operational impact of the outbreak at Camp Arifjan was dramatic. Not only was there a surge in illness among service members in transit, the definitive steps taken to preclude the spread of the contagious virus elsewhere resulted in the shutdown of a key USCENTCOM transit station for about 10 days. The unique setting and circumstances of this outbreak highlight several public health gaps faced by deployed service members and those providing health care in this environment. Because no outbreak investigation standard operating procedure (SOP) was in place before this outbreak, the investigation and response were implemented de novo. The absence of an SOP for handling outbreaks is an acknowledged gap across many military treatment facilities, both within the U.S. and in deployed operations.10 The lack of an SOP delayed the initiation of an outbreak investigation by PM and nursing teams. The outbreak highlighted that cleaning staff were not initially using proper techniques to disinfect the latrines, which may have contributed to additional cases. The size of the outbreak and the concomitant tasks of identifying, finding, treating, and responding to the high number of cases overwhelmed the PM staff and directly impacted the delay in reporting details of this outbreak according to DoD policy until the outbreak was nearly over. An approved theater outbreak response plan is needed in order to help mitigate and prevent future outbreaks in theater. Such a plan should be centrally drafted at the level of the medical brigade, not by each unit or location. A general response plan should be encouraged for each location, but the PM assets and expertise required to manage an outbreak may not always be available at each location.

The physicians at the 75th Combat Support Hospital who evaluated and treated the index patient released him to return to his billeting. However, in a deployed environment, a significant consideration is to protect the force by removing patients who are potentially infectious from the general population. Although the theater PM physician and 223rd PM commander were able to identify and readmit the index case within 2 hours of his ED discharge, it is unknown how many others the index case may have exposed during this time, especially given the poor cleaning procedures being utilized during that period. A theater outbreak response plan must include specifics for protecting the health of other service members when one of them is ill and may be highly infectious.

Laboratory capabilities are limited throughout the theater. For most diseases requiring laboratory support, specimens are sent to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center for processing, which can cause a significant delay in diagnosis and treatment. However, for this outbreak, the use of the BioFire® system allowed for immediate testing of specimens in Camp Arifjan. As a result of this outbreak, the theater medical command learned the value of the rapid nucleic acid detection system and acquired additional systems for hospitals and traveling PM teams throughout the theater.

PM assets of the medical brigade, namely the theater PM physician and the commander of the PM detachment, advised the medical brigade commander to recommend to the installation commander the 3 major actions that resulted in control of the norovirus outbreak. Those actions were 1) the halting of flights in and out of Camp Arifjan; 2) the isolation of infected, symptomatic patients and the quarantine of recovering and exposed service members; and 3) the restriction of movement of service members to prevent spread of infection to others outside the quarantine area.

At the time of the Camp Arifjan outbreak, an additional outbreak thought to be due to norovirus occurred in a classified country, where 13 soldiers were identified with symptoms consistent with norovirus. On 27 May, a PM surveillance laboratory team and the theater PM physician were forward deployed to determine the root cause of that outbreak. A link between the 2 outbreaks could not be proven.

Given the number of service members located at Camp Arifjan at the time and the high attack rate of norovirus, the case count could have been in the thousands. Despite the successful response, this outbreak highlighted the need for a theater outbreak response plan, which should include details on responding to infectious patients in the deployed environment and frequent education and review of proper cleaning techniques and personal hygiene. This outbreak also demonstrated the importance of inclusion of the medical brigade PM teams for any outbreak investigations in theater. The epidemic curve suggests this was a point source epidemic, originating from the index case and then further spreading via person-to-person contact and contaminated environmental surfaces, including latrines. Because of the efforts of the public health teams, the outbreak response was successful in limiting the breadth and duration of the outbreak.

Author Affiliations: Army Satellite of Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch, Defense Health Agency (Ms. Kebisek, Dr. Ambrose); 223rd Medical Detachment, Preventive Medicine (MAJ Richards); 223rd Medical Detachment, Microbiology (MAJ Hourihan); 75th Combat Support Hospital Detachment, Public Health Nursing (CPT Buckelew); Theater Preventive Medicine Physician, TF 1st MED (COL Finder)

REFERENCES

1. Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. Gastrointestinal infections, active component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2002–2012. MSMR. 2013;20(10):7–11.

2. Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. Surveillance snapshot: Norovirus outbreaks among military forces, 2008–2016. MSMR. 2017;24(7):30.

3. Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. Historical perspective: Norovirus gastroenteritis outbreaks in military forces. MSMR. 2011;18(11):7–8.

4. Darling ND, Poss DE, Brooks KM, et al. Brief report: Laboratory characterization of noroviruses identified in specimens from Military Health System beneficiaries during an outbreak in Germany, 2016–2017. MSMR. 2017;24(7):2–29.

5. Kasper MR, Lescano AG, Lucas C, et al. Diarrhea outbreak during U.S. military training in El Salvador. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(7).

6. Putnam SD, Sanders JW, Frenck RW, et al. Self-reported description of diarrhea among military populations in Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom. J Travel Med. 2006;13(2):92–99.

7. Riddle MS, Martin GJ, Murray CK, et al. Management of acute diarrheal illness during redeployment: a deployment health guideline and expert panel report. Mil Med. 2017;182(9):34–52.

8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated norovirus outbreak management and disease prevention guidelines. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2011;4(60):1–18.

9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Norovirus. https://www.cdc.gov/norovirus/about/index.html. Accessed 3 June 2019.

10. Ambrose J, Kebisek J, Gibson K, White D. Gaps in reportable medical event surveillance across the Department of Defense and recommended tools to improve surveillance practices. MSMR. 2019. In press.

Layout of gateway area, where the majority of initial cases resided

Daily case count for confirmed and suspected norovirus cases, Camp Arifjan, May 2018Demographics of, and symptoms reported by, cases at Camp Arifjan, Kuwait

You also may be interested in...

Modeling Lyme Disease Host Animal Habitat Suitability, West Point, New York

Article
4/1/2019
A deer basks in the morning sun at Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston, Texas.  (Photo Courtesy: U.S. Air Force)

As the most frequently reported vector-borne disease among active component U.S. service members, with an incidence rate of 16 cases per 100,000 person-years in 2011, Lyme disease poses both a challenge to healthcare providers in the Military Health System and a threat to military readiness. Spread through the bite of an infected blacklegged tick, infection with the bacterial cause of Lyme disease can have lasting effects that may lead to medical discharge from the military. The U.S. Military Academy at West Point is situated in a highly endemic area in New York State. To identify probable areas where West Point cadets as well as active duty service members stationed at West Point and their families might contract Lyme disease, this study used Geographic Information System mapping methods and remote sensing data to replicate an established spatial model to identify the likely habitat of a key host animal—the white-tailed deer.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Update: Heat Illness, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2018

Article
4/1/2019
Drink water the day before and during physical activity or if heat is going to become a factor. (Photo Courtesy: U.S. Air Force)

In 2018, there were 578 incident diagnoses of heat stroke and 2,214 incident diagnoses of heat exhaustion among active component service members. The overall crude incidence rates of heat stroke and heat exhaustion diagnoses were 0.45 cases and 1.71 cases per 1,000 person-years, respectively. In 2018, subgroup-specific rates of incident heat stroke diagnoses were highest among males and service members less than 20 years old, Asian/Pacific Islanders, Marine Corps and Army members, recruit trainees, and those in combat-specific occupations. Subgroup-specific incidence rates of heat exhaustion diagnoses in 2018 were notably higher among service members less than 20 years old, Asian/Pacific Islanders, Army and Marine Corps members, recruit trainees, and service members in combat-specific occupations. During 2014–2018, a total of 325 heat illnesses were documented among service members in Iraq and Afghanistan; 8.6% (n=28) were diagnosed as heat stroke. Commanders, small unit leaders, training cadre, and supporting medical personnel must ensure that the military members whom they supervise and support are informed about the risks, preventive countermeasures, early signs and symptoms, and first-responder actions related to heat illnesses.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Exertional Hyponatremia

Infographic
4/1/2019
Exertional Hyponatremia

Each year, the MSMR summarizes the numbers, rates, trends, risk factors, and locations of occurrences of exertional heat injuries, including exertional rhabdomyolysis. This report includes the data for 2014–2018.

Recommended Content:

Health Readiness | Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch | Epidemiology and Analysis | Medical Surveillance Monthly Report | Public Health

Lyme Disease

Infographic
4/1/2019
Lyme Disease

Each year, the MSMR summarizes the numbers, rates, trends, risk factors, and locations of occurrences of exertional heat injuries, including exertional rhabdomyolysis. This report includes the data for 2014–2018.

Recommended Content:

Health Readiness | Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch | Epidemiology and Analysis | Medical Surveillance Monthly Report | Public Health

Heat Illness

Infographic
4/1/2019
Heat Illness

This report summarizes reportable medical events of heat illness as well as heat illness-related hospitalizations and ambulatory visits among active component service members during 2018 and compares them to the previous 4 years. Episodes of heat stroke and heat exhaustion are summarized separately.

Recommended Content:

Health Readiness | Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch | Epidemiology and Analysis | Medical Surveillance Monthly Report | Public Health

Exertional Rhabdomyolysis

Infographic
4/1/2019
Exertional Rhabdomyolysis

Each year, the MSMR summarizes the numbers, rates, trends, risk factors, and locations of occurrences of exertional heat injuries, including exertional rhabdomyolysis. This report includes the data for 2014–2018.

Recommended Content:

Health Readiness | Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch | Epidemiology and Analysis | Medical Surveillance Monthly Report | Public Health

Update: Exertional Rhabdomyolysis, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2014–2018

Article
4/1/2019
U.S. Marines sprint uphill during a field training exercise at Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, California. to maintain contact with an aviation combat element, teaching and sustaining their proficiency in setting up and maintaining communication equipment.  (Photo Courtesy: U.S. Marine Corps)

Among active component service members in 2018, there were 545 incident diagnoses of rhabdomyolysis likely due to exertional rhabdomyolysis, for an unadjusted incidence rate of 42.0 cases per 100,000 person-years. Subgroup-specific rates in 2018 were highest among males, those less than 20 years old, Asian/Pacific Islander service members, Marine Corps and Army members, and those in combat-specific or “other/unknown” occupations. During 2014–2018, crude rates of exertional rhabdomyolysis increased steadily from 2014 through 2016 after which rates declined slightly in 2017 before increasing again in 2018. Compared to service members in other race/ethnicity groups, the overall rate of exertional rhabdomyolysis was highest among non-Hispanic blacks in every year except 2018. Overall and annual rates were highest among Marine Corps members, intermediate among those in the Army, and lowest among those in the Air Force and Navy. Most cases of exertional rhabdomyolysis were diagnosed at installations that support basic combat/recruit training or major ground combat units of the Army or the Marine Corps. Medical care providers should consider exertional rhabdomyolysis in the differential diagnosis when service members (particularly recruits) present with muscular pain or swelling, limited range of motion, or the excretion of dark urine (possibly due to myoglobinuria) after strenuous physical activity, particularly in hot, humid weather.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Sexually Transmitted Infections

Infographic
3/20/2019
Sexually Transmitted Infections

This report summarizes incidence rates of the 5 most common sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among active component service members of the U.S. Armed Forces during 2010–2018.

Recommended Content:

Health Readiness | Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch | Epidemiology and Analysis | Medical Surveillance Monthly Report | Public Health

Testosterone Replacement Therapy

Infographic
3/20/2019
Testosterone Replacement Therapy

With the increasing number of testosterone deficiency diagnoses and potential health risks associated with initiation of TRT, it is important to understand the epidemiology of which U.S. service men are receiving TRT and whether these individuals have an indication for receiving treatment.

Recommended Content:

Health Readiness | Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch | Epidemiology and Analysis | Medical Surveillance Monthly Report | Public Health

Vasectomy

Infographic
3/20/2019
Vasectomy

There are few published studies of vasectomy and vasectomy reversal among the U.S. military population. To address these gaps, the current analysis describes the overall and annual incidence rates of vasectomy among active component service men during 2000–2017 by demographic and military characteristics and by type of surgical vas isolation procedure used. In addition, the median age at incident vasectomy and the time between incident vasectomy and first vasectomy reversal are described.

Recommended Content:

Health Readiness | Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch | Epidemiology and Analysis | Medical Surveillance Monthly Report | Public Health

Male Infertility

Infographic
3/20/2019
Male Infertility

The current report updates and expands on the findings of the previous MSMR analysis of infertility among active component service men. Specifically, the current report summarizes the frequencies, rates, temporal trends, types of infertility, and demographic and military characteristics of infertility among active component service men during 2013–2017.

Recommended Content:

Health Readiness | Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch | Epidemiology and Analysis | Medical Surveillance Monthly Report | Public Health

Sexually Transmitted Infections, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2010–2018

Article
3/1/2019
Anopheles merus

This report summarizes incidence rates of the 5 most common sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among active component service members of the U.S. Armed Forces during 2010–2018. Infections with chlamydia were the most common, followed in decreasing order of frequency by infections with genital human papillomavirus (HPV), gonorrhea, genital herpes simplex virus (HSV), and syphilis. Compared to men, women had higher rates of all STIs except for syphilis. In general, compared to their respective counterparts, younger service members, non-Hispanic blacks, soldiers, and enlisted members had higher incidence rates of STIs. During the latter half of the surveillance period, the incidence of chlamydia and gonorrhea increased among both male and female service members. Rates of syphilis increased for male service members but remained relatively stable among female service members. In contrast, the incidence of genital HPV and HSV decreased among both male and female service members. Similarities to and differences from the findings of the last MSMR update on STIs are discussed.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Testosterone Replacement Therapy Use Among Active Component Service Men, 2017

Article
3/1/2019
Anopheles merus

This analysis summarizes the prevalence of testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) during 2017 among active component service men by demographic and military characteristics. This analysis also determines the percentage of those receiving TRT in 2017 who had an indication for receiving TRT using the 2018 American Urological Association (AUA) clinical practice guidelines. In 2017, 5,093 of 1,076,633 active component service men filled a prescription for TRT, for a period prevalence of 4.7 per 1,000 male service members. After adjustment for covariates, the prevalence of TRT use remained highest among Army members, senior enlisted members, warrant officers, non-Hispanic whites, American Indians/Alaska Natives, those in combat arms occupations, healthcare workers, those who were married, and those with other/unknown marital status. Among active component male service members who received TRT in 2017, only 44.5% met the 2018 AUA clinical practice guidelines for receiving TRT.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Brief Report: Male Infertility, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2013–2017

Article
3/1/2019
Sperm is the male reproductive cell  Photo: iStock

Infertility, defined as the inability to achieve a successful pregnancy after 1 year or more of unprotected sexual intercourse or therapeutic donor insemination, affects approximately 15% of all couples. Male infertility is diagnosed when, after testing both partners, reproductive problems have been found in the male. A male factor contributes in part or whole to about 50% of cases of infertility. However, determining the true prevalence of male infertility remains elusive, as most estimates are derived from couples seeking assistive reproductive technology in tertiary care or referral centers, population-based surveys, or high-risk occupational cohorts, all of which are likely to underestimate the prevalence of the condition in the general U.S. population.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Vasectomy and Vasectomy Reversals, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2000–2017

Article
3/1/2019
Sperm is the male reproductive cell  Photo: iStock

During 2000–2017, a total of 170,878 active component service members underwent a first-occurring vasectomy, for a crude overall incidence rate of 8.6 cases per 1,000 person-years (p-yrs). Among the men who underwent incident vasectomy, 2.2% had another vasectomy performed during the surveillance period. Compared to their respective counterparts, the overall rates of vasectomy were highest among service men aged 30–39 years, non-Hispanic whites, married men, and those in pilot/air crew occupations. Male Air Force members had the highest overall incidence of vasectomy and men in the Marine Corps, the lowest. Crude annual vasectomy rates among service men increased slightly between 2000 and 2017. The largest increases in rates over the 18-year period occurred among service men aged 35–49 years and among men working as pilots/air crew. Among those who underwent vasectomy, 1.8% also had at least 1 vasectomy reversal during the surveillance period. The likelihood of vasectomy reversal decreased with advancing age. Non-Hispanic black and Hispanic service men were more likely than those of other race/ethnicity groups to undergo vasectomy reversals.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report
<< < 1 2 3 4 5  ... > >> 
Showing results 46 - 60 Page 4 of 8

DHA Address: 7700 Arlington Boulevard | Suite 5101 | Falls Church, VA | 22042-5101

Some documents are presented in Portable Document Format (PDF). A PDF reader is required for viewing. Download a PDF Reader or learn more about PDFs.