Back to Top Skip to main content

Tick-borne encephalitis surveillance in U.S. military service members and beneficiaries, 2006–2018

©ECDC/Photo by Guy Hendrickx Tickbite. ©ECDC/Photo by Guy Hendrickx

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

ABSTRACT

The risk of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) among U.S. military service members and beneficiaries residing in or traveling to Europe has not been assessed since the 1990s. The primary objective of this study was to assess the current risk of TBE in this population. Records of reportable medical events, inpatient and outpatient care, and laboratory test results were searched for TBE cases between 2006 and 2018. There were 8 individuals who met the case definition for TBE over the 13-year interval; 7 cases occurred during 2017 or 2018. Outpatient records did not identify any additional verified cases of TBE but revealed a large number of misclassified diagnoses. The risk of TBE among U.S. military service members and beneficiaries is low but may have increased in recent years. Military members and their dependents residing in Europe or Asia generally have a risk for TBE similar to that of other residents of the host nation. Additionally, there may be locations or activities that place certain individuals or units at increased risk for TBE, thus warranting additional control measures such as active surveillance, enhanced personal protective measures, and vaccination.

WHAT ARE THE NEW FINDINGS?    

The risk of TBE among U.S. military service members and beneficiaries is low but not negligible. There were 8 cases of TBE among U.S. military service members and beneficiaries between 2006 and 2018, 7 of which occurred in 2017 or 2018. Case finding using outpatient data did not identify additional cases and revealed a large number of misclassified diagnoses.

WHAT IS THE IMPACT ON READINESS AND FORCE HEALTH PROTECTION?

Although the risk of TBE among U.S. military personnel and their dependents is similar to residents of the host nation, there may be locations and activities that place individuals and military units at increased risk. U.S. military public health activities in Europe should ensure the implementation of TBE control measures, including accurate and timely surveillance, proper personal protective and tick avoidance measures, and risk-based vaccination.

BACKGROUND

In 2012, tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) became a notifiable disease for healthcare professionals in Europe to report to public health agencies. Since then, the reported incidence of TBE in Europe has increased. The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) has concluded that this increase is “consistent with a stable long-term trend” in the European Union, possibly related to environmental conditions.1 However, it is also possible that this increase may be influenced by enhanced surveillance and diagnosis rather than (or in addition to) a true increase in the incidence of disease.

In 2016, there were 2,674 confirmed cases of TBE reported across the European Union and European Economic Area (EU/EEA), for an overall incidence of 0.6 per 100,000 population.1 In Germany, the European country in which the greatest number of U.S. military service members and beneficiaries are stationed, surveillance for TBE (also called Frühsommer-Meningoenzephalitis [FSME] in German) by health authorities began much earlier—in 2001. The majority (89.0%) of TBE cases in Germany reported between 2001 and 2018 occurred in the southern states of Baden-Wurttemberg (BW) and Bavaria,2 both of which contain U.S. military installations and personnel. The annual incidence rate of TBE in Germany during that time period ranged from 0.7 to 2.0 cases per 100,000 persons per year, but the average rate in high-risk areas such as BW and Bavaria was 3.7 (range: 0–48) cases per 100,000 persons per year.2 While there was no significant change in TBE incidence noted between 2001 and 2016, the years of 2017 and 2018 were marked by an increase in rates compared to the previous years. Countries in the Baltic states had the highest reported rates of disease, although comparisons between countries are difficult because of differences in case definitions, laboratory diagnosis, and other surveillance capabilities.3

U.S. military personnel may engage in activities or behaviors that place them at risk for increased contact with the primary tick vector responsible for TBE transmission, Ixodes ricinus. These activities include hiking and camping and outdoor work activities such as forest work or military field exercises.4,5 In the 1980s and 1990s, serological studies of U.S. military service members in areas felt to have high risk for TBE found a relatively low seroprevalence (7.2%) among soldiers stationed in Bavaria and Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany,6 and low rates of infection (0.9 and 0.7 seroconversions per 1,000 person-months) in Germany and Bosnia, respectively.7,8 Only 1 reported case of symptomatic but unconfirmed TBE disease was found in a review of all inpatient medical records from facilities in central Europe from 1970 to 1983.7 Nevertheless, these historical data are not adequate to estimate the current risk to U.S. service members and their dependents, and no assessment of TBE incidence in U.S. military service members or beneficiaries has been published since the 1990s. Furthermore, most prior studies only assessed the risk of TBE in small, focally defined areas, and the risk to U.S. military personnel in the countries of eastern Europe and Asia is unknown.

The primary objective of this study was to determine the number of TBE cases among all U.S. military service members and other beneficiaries worldwide between 2006 and 2018, with a special focus on the risk of TBE in Europe, in order to inform current public health risk assessment and force health protection posture. Although TBE is reportable for all Department of Defense (DoD) beneficiaries in the military’s reportable medical events (RMEs) system under the category “arboviral disease,”9 some cases might not be reported since TBE is not a reportable disease in the U.S. civilian public health system10 and because healthcare providers may not be aware of U.S. military and German reporting requirements. The secondary objectives of this study were to examine the completeness and accuracy of various data sources, evaluate existing case-finding algorithms, and determine a valid TBE surveillance case definition for future use.

METHODS

This investigation was reviewed and approved by the Defense Health Agency’s Human Research Protections Office as a public health surveillance activity. The population at risk was all U.S. military service members and beneficiaries between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2018. For the primary analysis, possible TBE cases were identified by examination of all outpatient and inpatient encounters and all RMEs in the Defense Medical Surveillance System (DMSS)11 with a diagnosis of TBE (parent International Classification of Diseases, 9th [ICD-9] and 10th [ICD-10] Revision codes of 063 or A84, respectively). The TBE case definitions established by the ECDC were used to classify the cases.12 The clinical criteria included any person with symptoms of inflammation of the central nervous system. To be a confirmed case, the patient had to meet the clinical criteria and have at least 1 of the following 5 laboratory findings: 1) TBE-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies in blood, 2) TBE-specific IgM antibodies in the cerebrospinal fluid, 3) seroconversion or 4-fold increase of TBE-specific antibodies in paired serum samples, 4) detection of TBE viral nucleic acid in a clinical specimen, or 5) isolation of TBE virus from a clinical specimen. A probable case was defined as any person who met the clinical criteria and had either 1) an epidemiological link or 2) detection of TBE-specific IgM antibodies in a unique serum sample. Only confirmed or probable cases were included in the analysis.

The data repository of the military’s electronic medical record (EMR), the Armed Forces Health Longitudinal Technology Application (AHLTA), was reviewed to determine whether the subset of individuals with a record of a TBE diagnosis identified in DMSS records between 2016 and 2018 met the case definition. The review of AHLTA records included examination of all outpatient, inpatient, vaccine, and laboratory records from military treatment facilities (MTFs) in the EMR. Of note, the EMR also included scanned records of inpatient and outpatient encounters that occurred at non-MTFs. Information from hospitalizations at host nation medical facilities was obtained through English translations of the discharge summaries that had also been scanned and uploaded into the EMR. When records were not sufficiently complete to determine whether the patient had been a true TBE case, the patient was contacted via phone (if contact information was available) to obtain additional information.

To evaluate the completeness and accuracy of various alternative data sources and determine a surveillance case definition for future use, additional record reviews were performed. Laboratory records were available from 2006 through 2018 and included all TBE positive lab results from the EpiData Center (EDC) at the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps Public Health Center.13,14 Of note, these laboratory data included only tests that were performed or reported by an MTF. Findings were also compared with those obtained from direct and purchased care data from TRICARE Europe found in the Military Health System Data Repository (MDR), again using inpatient and outpatient TBE diagnoses that occurred in Europe between 2016 and 2018. The sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of these alternate data sources were estimated in accordance with U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S. CDC) guidelines for the evaluation of surveillance systems.15 Because of the small number of cases and lack of appropriate denominators, rates were not calculated.

RESULTS

During 2006–2018, a total of 8 individuals met the TBE case definition (4 confirmed and 4 probable) (Figure 1). Table 1 shows a list of the cases and their characteristics. Laboratory results and disease sequelae were inconsistently documented in the EMR. All cases had reported fever; other symptoms were variable. Five of the cases were service members and 3 were dependent children. Although the numbers are small, the number of cases in 2017–2018 (n=7) greatly exceeded the number from the previous 11 years (n=1), suggesting an increased TBE risk in recent years. The cases all occurred during the expected months of April through November. Of note, no cases were travelers to or residents of any location other than in Europe or in any German states other than BW and Bavaria. None of the cases had a prior history of TBE vaccine.

In order to assess the validity of the TBE definition, the medical records were reviewed for the 166 unique individuals with diagnoses of TBE identified from RMEs and outpatient and inpatient records in the DMSS between 2016 and 2018. Of these unique individuals, 157 had outpatient TBE diagnoses, 15 had inpatient diagnoses, and 5 had RMEs. Of the 166 individuals, 7 (4.2%) were determined to meet the case definition for confirmed (4) or probable (3) TBE. There was 1 additional record of TBE from Navy and Marine Corps Public Health Center laboratory data in an individual who had no TBE records in the DMSS, for a total of 167 individuals with a TBE record. The overlap of records among these different data sources is shown in Figure 2. The PPV and sensitivity of the types of records and diagnoses are listed in Table 2. All of the 7 cases were found to have either an inpatient (6) or an RME (5) diagnosis of TBE, and 4 had both. All 5 individuals with an RME were hospitalized, although 1 had an inpatient ICD-10 diagnosis code of A86 (viral encephalitis, unspecified). Of the 17 individuals who had either an RME, hospitalization, or lab record of TBE, 8 (47.1%) had no evidence of residence or medical care in Europe. Of the 9 hospitalized cases with a misclassified TBE diagnosis, 4 had a diagnosis of another tick-borne disease such as suspected Lyme disease, history of prior Lyme disease, or Rocky Mountain spotted fever. Of the remaining 5 individuals, 1 had long-standing headache symptoms and tested negative for TBE; the others had little or no documentation in their available health records to substantiate a diagnosis of TBE. Of the 157 outpatient diagnoses in the DMSS, 57 were diagnosed in Europe and 100 were either diagnosed outside of Europe or the place of care could not be determined. Of the 50 outpatient diagnoses from Europe that did not meet the case definition, 47 (94.0%) had an encounter for TBE vaccination on the date of TBE diagnosis, 1 (2.0%) had headache or other suggestive symptoms but did not meet the clinical case definition, and 2 (4.0%) had no visits in the EMR on or around the diagnosis date. Of the 100 outpatient cases diagnosed outside of Europe, none met the case definition. Most of these diagnoses occurred in the U.S. among retirees who had no record of care at an MTF. The few who did receive care at an MTF were seen for a tick or other insect bite.

For the period from 2006 through 2015, medical records were reviewed only for those 22 individuals who had an inpatient or RME diagnosis of TBE; only 1 of these individuals met the case definition. All 22 had an inpatient diagnosis of TBE and none had an RME.

Finally, the alternative data sources, including EDC laboratory and TRICARE Europe inpatient and outpatient data (from the MDR) were examined to identify additional cases of TBE. There were 2 individuals with a positive laboratory test for TBE between 2006 and 2018. One individual had already been identified as an RME, and the other did not meet the case definition (sensitivity=14.2%; PPV=50%). TRICARE Europe data from inpatient and outpatient care in Europe revealed 104 individuals with a TBE diagnosis between 2016 and 2018, 57 of whom were also ascertained from DMSS data. All 7 of the confirmed or probable TBE cases were included in this group (sensitivity=100%; PPV=6.7%). Of the additional 47 individuals identified with a TBE diagnosis who were not ascertained from DMSS data, all had only outpatient TBE diagnoses and none met the case definition for TBE. Thirty-seven (78.7%) of the 47 individuals had a medical encounter for TBE vaccine that was miscoded as TBE disease.

EDITORIAL COMMENT

Of the 8 confirmed or probable cases of TBE among U.S. military service members and beneficiaries during the 13-year surveillance period, 7 occurred in 2017 or 2018. Five of the cases occurred in service members and 3 in children; all cases occurred in Germany in the states of BW or Bavaria. There were no cases of TBE identified among U.S. military service members or beneficiaries traveling to Europe. All but 1 of the cases were hospitalized in a host nation medical facility, and most of the case information was extracted from translations of those hospitalization records. RME surveillance identified 5 of the cases, while laboratory data identified only 1. This is not surprising, as only laboratory tests from MTFs could reliably be obtained and only 1 of the cases was treated in an MTF. Additional case finding using outpatient records revealed large numbers of misclassified cases regardless of data source, largely from medical encounters for TBE vaccine or tick bites that were miscoded as TBE disease. In summary, review of outpatient records identified no additional cases of TBE beyond those already found in RME and inpatient records.

This study provides an update to the current knowledge about the risk of TBE among service members and other beneficiaries. Two previous military studies examined the risk of infection in Germany and Bosnia by assessing seroconversion and found no cases of TBE disease.6,8 Another military study reviewed military hospitalization data in Europe and found 1 case of unconfirmed TBE in military medical records between 1970 and 1983, a time when a much larger number of military personnel were living in Germany.7 The incidence rate of TBE in Germany was 2.0 per 100,000 in 2018, with a rate of 3.7 in higher-risk areas such as BW and Bavaria.2 Given these rates and based on a population of approximately 50,000 U.S. military service members and beneficiaries dispersed throughout Germany, approximately 1 case per year would be expected. The current study found a very similar overall number of 8 cases over a 13-year period, with all but 1 case identified during the past 2 years. Although small numbers precluded formal statistical testing, the increased number of cases in 2017 and 2018 seen here is similar to the statistically significant increases reported in the German population. Additionally, the experiences in nearby Austria demonstrate the focal nature of TBE and the potential of TBE to emerge in previously unaffected populations despite high vaccination coverage.16 No cases among military-associated travelers to Europe were seen in the current study, consistent with prior assessments of low risk among most travelers.5,17 While only 7 cases of TBE among non-military U.S. travelers were reported between 2000 and 2015, TBE is not a notifiable condition in the U.S., so additional cases may have occurred.5

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends routine TBE vaccination in areas where the disease is highly endemic (defined as a rate of = 5 per 100,000 per year).18 In regions with lower incidence, WHO recommends targeting only those who are at higher than baseline risk and those that engage in extensive outdoor activities. The U.S. CDC suggests considering vaccination for those “anticipating high-risk exposures” as well as those “living in TBE-endemic countries for an extended period of time” but does not provide specific recommendations related to TBE vaccination.German policy among the civilian population is to vaccinate beginning at age 1 year if “substantial exposure” is anticipated but otherwise recommends deferring vaccination to age 3 years because of the risk of vaccine-related adverse events in the 1- to 2-year age group.19 Despite these recommendations, only 27% of the population is estimated to have been vaccinated against TBE, including only 37–40% in the higher-risk areas of BW and Bavaria.20 German military personnel are all required to receive TBE vaccine in order to be prepared to support national emergency response efforts in endemic areas (K. Erkens, MD, Lt Col, Bundeswehr, email communication, 13 November 2019).

The U.S. military has prior experience with TBE vaccine in Europe. As the vaccine is not licensed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), it must be obtained and administered by host nation providers in Europe outside the U.S. Military Health System. Although many service members and other U.S. military beneficiaries have obtained the vaccine, most of those residing in Germany never receive it. During deployment to Bosnia in the 1990s, the U.S. military’s desire to mitigate TBE risk resulted in TBE vaccine being made available to all DoD personnel at high risk of tick exposure.8 Since the vaccine was not licensed by the FDA, it could not be made mandatory for service members, so the vaccine was administered on a voluntary basis under an investigational new drug protocol. After several years, the program was discontinued because of improper documentation and “significant deviation” from the protocol noted by the Government Accounting Office and FDA.21 The European Command (EUCOM) and DoD public health leadership are now considering ways to obtain FDA licensure in order to offer TBE vaccine to service members and other beneficiaries living in or traveling to Europe who would be at high risk for TBE exposure. The findings of this study support the current recommendations to vaccinate only those U.S. military service members and beneficiaries at higher risk for TBE acquisition because of residence in an area of high endemicity or participation in extensive outdoor activities.5,17,18

Limitations of this study include a small number of cases and the potential for misclassification of outcome. Patients seeking care at host nation healthcare facilities may be undercounted in this report because these encounters and laboratory results may be insufficiently documented in AHTLA, thus not meeting the case definition applied here. This undercounting is expected to be modest in the active component because about 82% of these service members’ outpatient encounters and 68% of their inpatient encounters occur at MTFs.22,23 Although about 90% of non-service member beneficiary encounters occur outside of MTFs,24 potential undercounting is mitigated by the TRICARE Overseas Program contract requirement that the contractor translate medical documentation on request (S. Lynch, TRICARE Overseas Program Office, email communication, 24 July 2019). Many European MTFs appear to be actively engaged in obtaining/translating purchased care medical documentation and uploading it into the Health Artifact and Image Management Solution (HAIMS), which not only provides documentation for follow-up medical care but also allows for better public health surveillance and response.

Additionally, failure of healthcare providers to recognize TBE and comply with established diagnostic guidelines also may contribute to underestimation of disease.19,25 Asymptomatic and subclinical infection and failure of infected individuals to seek care also contribute to the undercounting of cases. The prevalence of subclinical infection would best be assessed by repeating prior studies of seroconversion, which has not been done in Germany since the early 1990s.6 On the other hand, recent increases in cases seen in Germany could be attributable to increased surveillance and awareness related to the 2012 ECDC reporting requirement. However, because Germany has required TBE case notification since 2001, this seems less likely. Because many of the hospitalizations attributed to TBE were actually from other tick-borne diseases, further provider education on and awareness of these diseases is indicated, as is ensuring their proper prevention, detection, and response. Updated recommendations on the diagnosis and management of tick-borne diseases in the U.S. are summarized for providers and public health practitioners in a recent U.S. CDC publication.26 Finally, the results from military populations may not be generalizable to U.S. travelers or other populations because of differences in occupational and other outdoor exposures.

Results of this study suggest that the RME case definition performs fairly well for routine surveillance of TBE. If a more precise estimate is desired, a modest improvement is possible by adding active surveillance of hospitalizations for TBE. However, because of a large proportion of misclassified diagnoses, record reviews are necessary to ascertain whether these additional diagnoses meet the case definition in order to accurately estimate the true TBE burden, assess public health risk, and inform force health protection posture. The ability to perform record review relies on the continuation of the current practice in EUCOM of entering records from care received at host nation medical facilities into the EMR. While the record review conducted in the current study indicated fairly complete documentation in the EMR of care received at host nation medical facilities in Germany, records from hospitalizations in the U.S. were uncommonly found in the EMR. Current surveillance for TBE can be further improved by increased awareness of clinical guidelines for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in both adults and children.17,19,25 Current TBE surveillance can also be improved by increased awareness of and adherence to DoD and host nation reporting requirements so that RMEs can be used to better detect changing trends in TBE incidence. Alternate case finding methods such as laboratory data and outpatient visits are likely to have minimal impact on TBE surveillance because of poor sensitivity and PPV, respectively. Human seroprevalence studies can be a useful complementary surveillance indicator but may be confounded from cross-reactivity to other flaviviruses or viruses of the TBE complex.6–8 Virus prevalence in ticks has been found to be of questionable value in surveillance efforts,27 a finding that is supported by the fact that only 4 of 1,153 ticks (0.3%) tested from passive surveillance at U.S. military installations in Europe from 2012 through 2018 were found to be infected with TBE (A. Cline, MAJ, U.S. Army Public Health Command-Europe, email communication, 20 May 2019).

The number of confirmed or probable TBE cases among U.S. military service members and beneficiaries is low but not negligible and has increased in recent years. Although military members and their dependents generally have the same risk for TBE as other residents of the host nation and should follow U.S. CDC guidance for travelers to these areas, there may be locations or activities that place these individuals at higher risk for disease. Commanders and U.S. military public health personnel in Europe should be familiar with and anticipate high-risk areas and activities U.S. personnel are likely to encounter. Furthermore, they should ensure that TBE control measures include accurate and timely surveillance, proper personal protective measures (PPMs), tick avoidance, and risk-based vaccination. There are several ways in which individuals and units can reduce their risk of TBE infection. Service members and dependents at risk for TBE should be counseled to avoid consuming unpasteurized dairy products, which can transmit TBE. Service members and dependents should also be counseled to use PPMs, particularly during field exercises and other outdoor activities and when stationed or visiting focal areas of increased TBE risk. PPMs include the DoD repellant system, which consists of maximally covering exposed skin with clothing, applying permethrin to clothing, and applying repellants to remaining exposed skin. Finally, service members and dependents should follow a risk-based strategy for vaccination consistent with national and international recommendations,5,17,18,25 and the U.S. military should consider the risks and benefits of compulsory TBE vaccination of service members, similar to German military policy.


Author affiliations: Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch, Public Health Division, Defense Health Agency, Silver Spring, MD

Acknowledgments: The authors would like to acknowledge Mr. Nicholas Seliga, EpiData Center, Navy and Marine Corps Public Health Center, for his assistance with the laboratory data; Mr. Shannon Lynch for his assistance obtaining data from the Military Health System Data Repository; Dr. Kay Erkens, Lt Col, Kommando Sanitätsdienst, UAbt VI 2.2, for consultation on German military vaccination policy; LTC Luke Mease for his review of and comments on an earlier version of this manuscript; and MAJ Amanda Cline, U.S. Army Public Health Command-Europe, for supplying the results from TBE tick surveillance in Europe.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or of the U.S. Government.

Sources of support: Support was provided by the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch of the Public Health Division at the Defense Health Agency.

REFERENCES

1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Annual epidemiological report for 2016: tick-borne encephalitis. Stockholm: ECDC;2018.

2. Hellenbrand W, Kreusch T, Bohmer MM, et al. Epidemiology of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) in Germany, 2001–2018. Pathogens. 2019;8(2):e42.

3. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Technical report: Epidemiological situation of tick-borne encephalitis in the European Union and European Free Trade Association countries. https://ecdc.europa.eu/sites/portal/files/media/en/publications/Publications/TBE-in-EU-EFTA.pdf. Accessed 21 July 2019.

4. Lindquist L, Vapalahti O. Tick-borne encephalitis. Lancet. 2008;371(9627):1861–1871.

5. Fischer M, Gould CV, Rollin, PE. Tickborne encephalitis. In: Brunette GW, Nemhauser JB, eds. CDC Yellow Book 2020: Health Information for International Travel. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2019:348.

6. Clement J, Leirs H, Armour V, et al. Serologic evidence for tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) in North-American military stationed in Germany. Acta Leiden. 1992;60(2):15–17.

7. McNeil JG, Lednar WM, Stansfield SK, Prier RE, Miller RN. Central European tick-borne encephalitis: assessment of risk for persons in the armed services and vacationers. J Infect Dis. 1985;152(3):650–651.

8. Craig SC, Pittman PR, Lewis TE, et al. An accelerated schedule for tick-borne encephalitis vaccine: the American military experience in Bosnia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999;61(6):874–878.

9. Defense Health Agency. Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. Armed Forces Reportable Medical Events. Guidelines and Case Definitions, 2017. https://health.mil/reference-Center/Publications/2017/07/17/Armed-Forces-Reportable-Medical-Events-Guidelines. Accessed 9 April 2019.

10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2019 National Notifiable Infectious Diseases. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nndss/conditions/notifiable/2019/infectious-diseases/. Accessed 12 April 2019.

11. Rubertone MV, Brundage JF. The Defense Medical Surveillance System and the Department of Defense serum repository: glimpses of the future of public health surveillance. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(12):1900–1904.

12. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. EU case definitions. https://ecdc.europa.eu/en/surveillance-and-disease-data/eu-case-definitions. Accessed 9 April 2019.

13. Nowak G. Description of the MHS Health Level 7 Chemistry Laboratory for Public Health Surveillance: Technical Document NMCPHC-EDCTD-1-2014. https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a590932.pdf. Accessed 9 April 2019.

14. Chukwuma U, Nowak G. Description of the MHS Health Level 7 Microbiology Laboratory for Public Health Surveillance: Technical Document NMCPHC-EDC-TD-1-2013. https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a590818.pdf. Accessed 9 April 2019.

15. German RR, Lee LM, Horan JM, et al. Updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems: recommendations from the Guidelines Working Group. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2001;50(RR-13):1–35.

16. Heinz FX, Stiasny K, Holzmann H, et al. Emergence of tick-borne encephalitis in new endemic areas in Austria: 42 years of surveillance. Euro Surveill. 2015;20(13):9–16.

17. Steffen R. Epidemiology of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) in international travellers to Western/Central Europe and conclusions on vaccination recommendations. J Travel Med. 2016;23(4):1–10.

18. World Health Organization. Vaccines against tick-borne encephalitis: WHO position paper. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2011;86(24):241–256.

19. Steffen R. Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) in children in Europe: epidemiology, clinical outcome and comparison of vaccination recommendations. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2019;10(1):100–110.

20. Erber W, Schmitt HJ. Self-reported tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccination coverage in Europe: results from a cross-sectional study. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2018;9(4):768–777.

21. Friedman MA. Letter From Department of Health and Human Services to Edward D. Martin, M.D., Acting Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affaires. Rockville, MD: Food and Drug Administration; 22 July 1997.

22. Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. Ambulatory visits, active component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2018. MSMR. 2019;26(5):19–25.

23. Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. Hospitalizations, active component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2018. MSMR. 2019;26(5):11–18.

24. Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. Absolute and relative morbidity burdens attributable to various illnesses and injuries, non-service member beneficiaries of the Military Health System, 2018. MSMR. 2019;26(5):40–50.

25. Taba P, Schmutzhard E, Forsberg P, et al. EAN consensus review on prevention, diagnosis and management of tick-borne encephalitis. Eur J Neurol. 2017;24(10):1214–e1261.

26. Biggs HM, Behravesh CB, Bradley KK, et al. Diagnosis and management of tickborne rickettsial diseases: Rocky Mountain spotted fever and other spotted fever group rickettsioses, ehrlichioses, and anaplasmosis—United States. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016;65(2):1–44.

27. Imhoff M, Hagedorn P, Schulze Y, Hellenbrand W, Pfeffer M, Niedrig M. Review: Sentinels of tick-borne encephalitis risk. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2015;6(5):592–600.

 

You also may be interested in...

Ambulatory Visits, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2017

Infographic
5/23/2018
ACTIVE COMPONENT, U.S. ARMED FORCES, 2017  This report documents the frequencies, rates, trends, and characteristics of ambulatory healthcare visits of active component members of the U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps.

ACTIVE COMPONENT, U.S. ARMED FORCES, 2017 This report documents the frequencies, rates, trends, and characteristics of ambulatory healthcare visits of active component members of the U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps.

Recommended Content:

Health Readiness | Epidemiology and Analysis | Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Morbidity Burdens Attributable to Various Illnesses and Injuries, Deployed Active and Reserve Component Service Member, U.S. Armed Forces, 2017

Infographic
5/23/2018
Morbidity Burdens Attributable to Various Illnesses and Injuries, Deployed Active and Reserve Component Service Member, U.S. Armed Forces, 2017

Recommended Content:

Health Readiness | Epidemiology and Analysis | Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Absolute and Relative Morbidity Burdens, Attributable to Various Illnesses and Injuries, 2017

Infographic
5/23/2018
Absolute and Relative Morbidity Burdens, Attributable to Various Illnesses and Injuries, 2017

Recommended Content:

Health Readiness | Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch | Epidemiology and Analysis | Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Hospitalizations, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2017

Infographic
5/23/2018
This report documents the frequencies, rates, trends, and distributions of hospitalizations of active component members of the U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps during calendar year 2017.

This report documents the frequencies, rates, trends, and distributions of hospitalizations of active component members of the U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps during calendar year 2017.

Recommended Content:

Health Readiness | Epidemiology and Analysis | Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Heat Illness

Infographic
4/13/2018
Exertional, or exercise-associated, hyponatremia refers to a low serum, plasma, or blood sodium concentration (below 135 milliequivalents/liter) that develops during or up to 24 hours following prolonged physical activity.

There were a total of 2,163 incident cases of heat illness among active component service members, including 464 cases of heat stroke and 1,699 cases of heat exhaustion.

Recommended Content:

Health Readiness | Epidemiology and Analysis | Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Rhabdomyolysis

Infographic
4/13/2018
Rhabdomyolysis

Recommended Content:

Health Readiness | Epidemiology and Analysis | Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Hyponatremia

Infographic
4/13/2018
Exertional, or exercise-associated, hyponatremia refers to a low serum, plasma, or blood sodium concentration (below 135 milliequivalents/liter) that develops during or up to 24 hours following prolonged physical activity.

Exertional, or exercise-associated, hyponatremia refers to a low serum, plasma, or blood sodium concentration (below 135 milliequivalents/liter) that develops during or up to 24 hours following prolonged physical activity.

Recommended Content:

Health Readiness | Epidemiology and Analysis | Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Cardiovascular Diseases

Infographic
4/4/2018
At the time of entry into military service, many members of the U.S. Armed Forces are young, physically active, and in good physical health. However, following entry, many service members develop or are discovered to have risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD). This report documents the incidence and prevalence of select risk factors for CVD among active component (AC) service members and provides estimates of the incidence rates of major categories of cardiovascular diseases themselves.

At the time of entry into military service, many members of the U.S. Armed Forces are young, physically active, and in good physical health. However, following entry, many service members develop or are discovered to have risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD). This report documents the incidence and prevalence of select risk factors for CVD among active component (AC) service members and provides estimates of the incidence rates of major categories of cardiovascular diseases themselves.

Recommended Content:

Health Readiness | Epidemiology and Analysis | Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Mental Health Problems

Infographic
4/4/2018
This report summarizes the numbers, natures, and rates of incident mental health disorder diagnoses as well as mental health problems among active component U.S. service members during 2007–2016.

This report summarizes the numbers, natures, and rates of incident mental health disorder diagnoses as well as mental health problems among active component U.S. service members during 2007–2016.

Recommended Content:

Health Readiness | Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch | Epidemiology and Analysis | Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Surveillance for Vector-Borne Diseases, Active and Reserve Component Service Members, U.S. Armed Forces, 2010 – 2016

Infographic
2/14/2018
Within the U.S. Armed Forces considerable effort has been applied to the prevention and treatment of vector-borne diseases. A key component of that effort has been the surveillance of vector-borne diseases to inform the steps needed to identify where and when threats exist and to evaluate the impact of preventive measures. This report summarizes available health records information about the occurrence of vector-borne infectious diseases among members of the U.S. Armed Forces, during a recent 7-year surveillance period. For the 7-surveillance period, there were 1,436 confirmed cases of vector-borne diseases, 536 possible cases, and 8,667 suspected cases among service members of the active and reserve components. •	“Confirmed” case = confirmed reportable medical event. •	“Possible” case = hospitalization with a diagnosis for a vector-borne disease. •	“Suspected” case = either a non-confirmed reportable medical event or an outpatient medical encounter with a diagnosis of a vector-borne disease. Lyme disease (n=721) and malaria (n=346) were the most common diagnoses among confirmed and possible cases. •	In 2015, the annual numbers of confirmed case of Lyme disease were the fewest reported during the surveillance period. •	Diagnoses of Chikungunya (CHIK) and Zika (ZIKV) were elevated in the years following their respective entries into the Western Hemisphere: CHIK (2014 and 2015); ZIKV (2016). The available data reinforce the need for continued emphasis on the multidisciplinary preventive measures necessary to counter the ever-present threat of vector-borne disease. Access the full report in the February 2018 MSMR (Vol. 25, No. 2). Go to www.Health.mil/MSMR  Background graphic shows service member in the field and insects which spread vector borne diseases.

This infographic summarizes available health records information about the occurrence of vector-borne infectious diseases among members of the U.S. Armed Forces, during a recent 7-year surveillance period (2010 – 2016).

Recommended Content:

Health Readiness | Epidemiology and Analysis | Medical Surveillance Monthly Report | Preventing Mosquito-Borne Illnesses | Chikungunya | Malaria | Zika Virus

Malaria U.S. Armed Forces, 2017

Infographic
2/14/2018
Since 1999, the Medical Surveillance Monthly Report (MSMR) has published periodic updates on the incidence of malaria among U.S. service members. Malaria infection remains an important health threat to U.S. service members, who are located in endemic areas because of long-term duty assignments, participation in shorter-term contingency operations, or personal travel. This update for 2017 describes the epidemiologic patterns of malaria incidence in active and reserve component service members of the U.S. Armed Forces. Findings •	A total of 32 service members were diagnosed with or reported to have malaria, which is the lowest number of cases in any given year during the 10-year surveillance period. •	Health records documented the performance of laboratory tests for malaria for 22 of the cases. The tests for 17 of the 22 were positive for malaria ( stick figure graphic visually depicts this information). •	In 2017, 75.0% (24 of 32) of malaria cases among U.S. service members were diagnosed during May – October (calendar graphic showing the months visually). •	Of the 32 malaria cases in 2017, more than 1/3 of the infections were considered to have been acquired in Africa. Two bar charts display the following information: •	Bar chart 1: Numbers of malaria cases by Plasmodium species and calendar year of diagnosis/report, active and reserve components, U.S. Armed Forces, 2008 – 2017  •	Bar chart 2: Annual numbers of cases of malaria associated with specific locations of acquisition, active and reserve components, U.S. Armed Forces, 2008 – 2017  The majority of U.S. military members diagnosed with malaria in 2017 were: •	Male (96.9%) •	Active component (81.3%) •	In the Army (75.0%) •	In their 20’s (56.3%) Access the full report in the February 2018 MSMR (Vol. 25 No. 2). Go to www.Health.mil/MSMR  Picture of a mosquito displays on the graphic.

This update for 2017 describes the epidemiologic patterns of malaria incidence in active and reserve component service members of the U.S. Armed Forces.

Recommended Content:

Health Readiness | Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch | Epidemiology and Analysis | Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Department of Defense Global, Laboratory-based Influenza Surveillance Program’s Influenza vaccine effectiveness estimates and surveillance trends, 2016 – 2017 Influenza Season

Infographic
2/5/2018
Each year, the Department of Defense (DoD) Global, Laboratory-based Influenza Surveillance Program performs surveillance for influenza among service members of the DoD and their dependent family members. In addition to routine surveillance, vaccine effectiveness (VE) studies are performed and results are shared with the Food and Drug Administration, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the World Health Organization for vaccine evaluation. This report documents the annual surveillance trends for the 2016 – 2017 influenza season and the end-of-season VE results. The analysis was performed by the U.S. Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine Epidemiology Laboratory, and the DoD Influenza Surveillance Program staff at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH. FINDINGS: A total of 5,555 specimens were tested from 84 locations: •	2,486 (44.7%) negative •	1,382 (24.9%) influenza A •	1,093 (19.7%) other respiratory pathogens •	443 (8.0%) influenza B •	151 (2.7%) co-infections The predominant influenza strain was A (H3N2), representing 73.8% of all circulating influenza. Pie chart displays this information. Graph showing the numbers and percentages of respiratory specimens positive for influenza viruses, and numbers of influenza viruses identified, by type, by surveillance week, Department of Defense healthcare beneficiaries, 2016 – 2017 influenza season displays. The vaccine effectiveness (VE) for this season was slightly lower than for the 2015 – 2016 season, which had a 63% (95% confidence interval: 53% - 71%) adjusted VE. The adjusted VE for the 2016 – 2017 season was 48% protective against all types of influenza.  Access the full report in the January 2018 MSMR (Vol. 25, No. 1). Go to: www.Health.mil/MSMR

This infographic documents the annual surveillance trends for the 2016 – 2017 influenza season and the end-of-season vaccine effectiveness.

Recommended Content:

Health Readiness | Influenza Summary and Reports | Medical Surveillance Monthly Report | Vaccine-Preventable Diseases | Force Health Protection | Global Health Engagement

Outbreak of Influenza and Rhinovirus co-circulation among unvaccinated recruits, U.S. Coast Guard Training Center Cape May, NJ, 24 July – 21 August 2016

Infographic
2/5/2018
On 29 July 2016, the U.S. Coast Guard Training Center Cape May (TCCM), NJ, identified an increase in febrile respiratory illness (FRI) among recruits who were unvaccinated against seasonal influenza as a result of the annual vaccine’s expiration. This report characterizes the outbreak and containment measures implemented at TCCM during the outbreak period. In 2016, respiratory infections affected more than 250,000 U.S. service members and comprised approximately 22% of medical encounters among military recruit populations – who are highly susceptible to respiratory infections. Seasonal influenza and rhinovirus are two of the leading respiratory pathogens. During the Surveillance Period: 115 recruits reported respiratory infection symptoms. Pie chart 1 shows the following data: •	41 (35.7%) suspected cases •	74 (64.3%) confirmed cases Among confirmed cases, lab specimens tested positive for: •	Influenza A 34 (45.9%) •	Rhinovirus 28 (37.8%) •	Influenza A and rhinovirus co-infection 11 (14.9%) •	Rhinovirus and adenovirus co-infection 1 (1.4%) Data above depicted in pie chart 2. •	24 July – 6 August, Influenza predominated •	7 August – 20 August, Rhinovirus predominated Although the outbreak significantly affected operations at TCCM, a timely and comprehensive response resulted in containment of the outbreak within 5 weeks. Key Factor for Outbreak Control •	Rapid detection through FRI sentinel surveillance •	Quick decision-making •	Streamlined response by using a single chain of command •	Rapid implementation of both nonpharmaceutical and pharmaceutical interventions Access the full report in the January 2018 MSMR (Vol. 25, No. 1). Go to: www.Health.mil/MSMR

This report characterizes the outbreak and containment measures implemented at the U.S. Coast Guard Training Center Cape May (TCCM), New Jersey, during a July 24 – August 21, 2016 outbreak period.

Recommended Content:

Health Readiness | Medical Surveillance Monthly Report | Integrated Biosurveillance | Influenza Summary and Reports

Insomnia and motor vehicle accident-related injuries, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2007 – 2016

Infographic
1/25/2018
Insomnia is the most common sleep disorder in adults and its incidence in the U.S. Armed Forces is increasing. A potential consequence of inadequate sleep is increased risk of motor vehicle accidents (MVAs). MVAs are the leading cause of peacetime deaths and a major cause of non-fatal injuries in the U.S. military members. To examine the relationship between insomnia and motor vehicle accident-related injuries (MVAs) in the U.S. military, this retrospective cohort study compared 2007 – 2016 incidence rates of MVA-related injuries between service members with diagnosed insomnia and service members without a diagnosis of insomnia. After adjustment for multiple covariates, during 2007 – 2016, active component service members with insomnia had more than double the rate of MVA-related injuries, compared to service members without insomnia. Findings:  •	Line graph shows the annual rates of motor vehicle accident-related injuries, active component service members with and without diagnoses of insomnia, U.S. Armed Forces, 2007 – 2016  •	Annual rates of MVA-related injuries were highest in the insomnia cohort in 2007 and 2008, and lowest in 2016 •	There were 5,587 cases of MVA-related injuries in the two cohorts during the surveillance period. •	Pie chart displays the following data: 1,738 (31.1%) in the unexposed cohort and 3,849 (68.9%) in the insomnia cohort The highest overall crude rates of MVA-related injuries were seen in service members who were: •	Less than 25 years old •	Junior enlisted rank/grade •	Armor/transport occupation •	 •	With a history of mental health diagnosis •	With a history of alcohol-related disorders Access the full report in the December 2017 (Vol. 24, No. 12). Go to www.Health.mil/MSMR Image displays a motor vehicle accident.

To examine the relationship between insomnia and motor vehicle accident-related injuries (MVAs) in the U.S. military, this retrospective cohort study compared 2007 – 2016 incidence rates of MVA-related injuries between service members with diagnosed insomnia and service members without a diagnosis of insomnia.

Recommended Content:

Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch | Health Readiness | Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Seizures among Active Component service members, U.S. Armed Forces, 2007 – 2016

Infographic
1/25/2018
This retrospective study estimated the rates of seizures diagnosed among deployed and non-deployed service members to identify factors associated with seizures and determine if seizure rates differed in deployment settings. It also attempted to evaluate the associations between seizures, traumatic brain injury (TBI), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) by assessing correlations between the incidence rates of seizures and prior diagnoses of TBI and PTSD. Seizures have been defined as paroxysmal neurologic episodes caused by abnormal neuronal activity in the brain. Approximately one in 10 individuals will experience a seizure in their lifetime. Line graph 1: Annual crude incidence rates of seizures among non-deployed service members, active component, U.S. Armed Forces data •	A total of 16,257 seizure events of all types were identified among non-deployed service members during the 10-year surveillance period. •	The overall incidence rate was 12.9 seizures per 10,000 person-years (p-yrs.) •	There was a decrease in the rate of seizures diagnosed in the active component of the military during the 10-year period. Rates reached their lowest point in 2015 – 9.0 seizures per 10,000 p-yrs. •	Annual rates were markedly higher among service members with recent PTSD and TBI diagnoses, and among those with prior seizure diagnoses. Line graph 2: Annual crude incidence rates of seizures by traumatic brain injury (TBI) and recent post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnosis among non-deployed active component service members, U.S. Armed Forces •	For service members who had received both TBI and PTSD diagnoses, seizure rates among the deployed and the non-deployed were two and three times the rates among those with only one of those diagnoses, respectively. •	Rates of seizures tended to be higher among service members who were: in the Army or Marine Corps, Female, African American, Younger than age 30, Veterans of no more than one previous deployment, and in the occupations of combat arms, armor, or healthcare Line graph 3: Annual crude incidence rates of seizures diagnosed among service members deployed to Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation Iraqi Freedom, or Operation New Dawn, U.S. Armed Forces, 2008 – 2016  •	A total of 814 cases of seizures were identified during deployment to operations in Iraq and Afghanistan during the 9-year surveillance period (2008 – 2016). •	For deployed service members, the overall incidence rate was 9.1 seizures per 10,000 p-yrs. •	Having either a TBI or recent PTSD diagnosis alone was associated with a 3-to 4-fold increase in the rate of seizures. •	Only 19 cases of seizures were diagnosed among deployed individuals with a recent PTSD diagnosis during the 9-year surveillance period. •	Overall incidence rates among deployed service members were highest for those in the Army, females, those younger than age 25, junior enlisted, and in healthcare occupations. Access the full report in the December 2017 MSMR (Vol. 24, No. 12). Go to www.Health.mil/MSMR

This infographic documents a retrospective study which estimated the rates of seizures diagnosed among deployed and non-deployed service members to identify factors associated with seizures and determine if seizure rates differed in deployment settings. The study also evaluated the associations between seizures, traumatic brain injury (TBI), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) by assessing correlations between the incidence rates of seizures and prior diagnoses of TBI and PTSD.

Recommended Content:

Health Readiness | Posttraumatic Stress Disorder | Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch | Medical Surveillance Monthly Report
<< < 1 2 3 4 > >> 
Showing results 46 - 60 Page 4 of 4

DHA Address: 7700 Arlington Boulevard | Suite 5101 | Falls Church, VA | 22042-5101

Some documents are presented in Portable Document Format (PDF). A PDF reader is required for viewing. Download a PDF Reader or learn more about PDFs.