Back to Top Skip to main content Skip to sub-navigation

Department of Defense Mid-Season Vaccine Effectiveness Estimates for the 2019– 2020 Influenza Season

201019-N-PC065-1062 NORFOLK (Oct. 19, 2020) Hospital Corpsman 2nd Class Sashee Robinson, assigned to amphibious transport dock ship USS Arlington (LPD 24), administers an influenza vaccine to Machinery Repairman 2nd Class Hannah Swearingen in medical aboard the Arlington. Influenza vaccines are an annual medical readiness requirement throughout the Department of Defense. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class John Bellino/Released) Hospital Corpsman 2nd Class Sashee Robinson, assigned to amphibious transport dock ship USS Arlington (LPD 24), administers an influenza vaccine to Machinery Repairman 2nd Class Hannah Swearingen in medical aboard the Arlington. Influenza vaccines are an annual medical readiness requirement throughout the Department of Defense. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class John Bellino)

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

What are the New Findings?

The 2019-2020 influenza vaccine provided moderate protection against influenza for beneficiary and civilian populations within the Department of Defense (DOD) and low to moderate protection against influenza for active component service members.

What is the Impact on Readiness and Force Health Protection?

Components of the influenza vaccine can change each season and novel influenza strains can appear and circulate among active component and DOD beneficiary populations. Conducting Vaccine Effectiveness (VE) studies every year can assist vaccine policy makers in making their decisions on strain selection for the influenza vaccine for the subsequent season, thus creating the most effective influenza vaccine, which can reduce morbidity and improve military readiness.

Abstract

This report provides mid-season VE estimates from the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division (AFHSD), the DOD Global Respiratory Pathogen Surveillance (DODGRS) program, and the Naval Health Research Center (NHRC) for the 2019-2020 influenza season. Using a test negative case-control study design, the AFHSD performed a VE analysis for active component service members while the DODGRS program and NHRC collaborated to perform a VE analysis for DOD beneficiaries and U.S.-Mexico border civilians. Among active component service members, there was low to moderate protection against influenza B, moderate protection against A(H3N2), and non-statistically significant low protection against influenza A overall and A(H1N1). Among DOD beneficiaries and U.S.-Mexico border civilians, there was statistically significant moderate protection against influenza B, influenza A overall, A(H1N1), and A(H3N2).

Background

Historically, military populations have been stationed in congregate settings that predispose them to acute respiratory infections, resulting in significantly increased morbidity, which has impacted military readiness.1 In previous seasons, it was estimated that 300,000 to 400,000 active component service members had medical encounters for respiratory infections.2 Specifically, influenza has had a significant impact on the military population for over a century. During the influenza pandemic of 1918, 43,000 U.S. service members were killed due to the H1N1 pandemic strain that was circulating at the time, constituting approximately 40% of all U.S. war deaths during World War I.3 On a yearly basis, the U.S. military requires influenza vaccination among active component personnel, with a goal of exceeding 90% immunization by mid-December of each year.2

Despite the high vaccination rate among the military population, vaccine breakthrough cases still occur. From 2007 through 2012, the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division (AFHSD) reported 7,000–25,000 cases of influenza infections to the Military Health System each week of the influenza seasons, 3,000 to 16,000 of which were military personnel.2,4,5 The Department of Defense conducts year-round influenza surveillance for military health beneficiaries and civilian populations, and the DOD uses these data to estimate midseason influenza VE, which is submitted annually to the Food and Drug Administration Vaccine and Related Biological Advisory Committee meeting. This report presents the mid-season VE estimates from the DOD 2019–2020 influenza season surveillance.

Methods

Two separate analyses were performed to produce mid-season DOD VE estimates, both using a test-negative, case-control study design. The study population for the AFHSD analysis consisted of active component service members from the Army, Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps stationed in the U.S. and abroad who were tested for influenza. Subjects were identified using the Defense Medical Surveillance System Health Level 7 data from the Navy and Marine Corps Public Health Center, and service member data from the Naval Health Research Center (NHRC) for specimens collected for influenza testing from 1 November 2019 to 15 February 2020. The AFHSD identified cases by either a positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), viral culture, or rapid test. Cases were laboratory-confirmed influenza positives and controls were influenza test negatives. Active component service members with a negative rapid test were excluded. Influenza vaccination status was ascertained through documentation in medical records. Subjects were considered vaccinated if the laboratory specimens were collected 14 days or more after vaccination. Crude and adjusted VE estimates were calculated using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) obtained from multivariable logistic regression models. VE estimates were adjusted for sex, age category, and month of specimen collection. VE was calculated as (1−OR) × 100. Results were stratified by influenza subtype. Due to differences in the timing of circulating influenza strains this season, the influenza B and influenza A(H3N2) analyses used specimens from the entire period of 1 November 2019 to 15 February 2020, whereas the influenza A overall and influenza A(H1N1) analyses were restricted to the peak influenza A circulation period of 1 January 2020 to 15 February 2020. Influenza A(H3N2) cases were few and sporadic throughout the season, which is why the entire period was used. All vaccinated populations were restricted to subjects who received inactivated influenza vaccine because the live attenuated influenza vaccine was not routinely used among active component service members during the 2019–2020 season.

The DOD Global Respiratory Pathogen Surveillance (DODGRS) program and NHRC combined their surveillance data to estimate VE among DOD beneficiaries and civilians whose specimens were collected from 3 November 2019 to 15 February 2020. Active component members were excluded from this analysis. Data from the DODGRS program pertained to DOD dependents who visited military treatment facilities and whose specimens were sent to and tested at the U.S. Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine (USAFSAM). NHRC's data pertained to civilian populations who visited clinics near the U.S.-Mexico border and outpatient DOD beneficiaries in Southern California and Illinois. Cases were patients whose laboratory tests confirmed the presence of influenza virus, and controls were patients whose influenza tests were negative. Cases and controls were identified by RT-PCR and/or viral culture. Vaccination status was determined through electronic immunization records from the Air Force Complete Immunization Tracking Application or self-report from questionnaires. Individuals were considered vaccinated if they received the vaccine at least 14 days prior to their specimen collection date. Those whose vaccination status could not be ascertained or those who were vaccinated within 14 days prior to their illness were excluded. Crude and adjusted VE estimates for this analysis were also calculated using ORs and 95% CIs obtained from multivariable logistic regression models. VE estimates were adjusted for age group, time of specimen collection, location, and sex. VE was calculated as (1−OR) × 100. Results were stratified by influenza subtype and population (all dependents, aged 2-17 years, and aged 18 years or older) (Table 1). Because of insufficient data, a sub-analysis for the elderly population (aged 65 years or older) was not possible.

Results

For AFHSD's active component service member influenza B and A(H3N2) analysis (November to February), there were 2,033 and 37 laboratory-confirmed cases of influenza B and A(H3N2), respectively, and 4,982 test-negative controls. For AFHSD's active component service member influenza A (any subtype) and A(H1N1) analysis (January to February), there were 1,911 and 347 laboratory-confirmed cases of influenza A (any subtype) and A(H1N1), respectively, and 2,222 test-negative controls. Although the crude VE estimate for influenza B was not statistically significantly different from zero, the adjusted VE estimate was statistically significant at 31%. The crude and adjusted VE estimates for influenza A(H3N2) were statistically significant at 49% and 58%, respectively. The adjusted VE estimates for influenza A (any subtype) and A(H1N1) did not reach statistical significance at 12% and 28%, respectively. The confidence intervals for crude and adjusted VE estimates are shown in the Table.

For the USAFSAM/NHRC DOD beneficiary and civilian analysis, there were 1,595 confirmed cases and 2,150 controls. With the exception of influenza A(H3N2) in adults, all adjusted VE estimates were statistically significantly different from zero. Moreover, the VE estimates were substantially higher for influenza B (unadjusted and adjusted) and influenza A(H3N2) (adjusted) than for influenza A(H1N1) and all influenza A subtypes.

Editorial Comment

Among active component service members, the mid-season 2019–2020 estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness indicated moderate protection against A(H3N2) (58%), low to moderate protection against influenza B (31%), and non-statistically significant low protection against influenza A overall (12%) and A(H1N1) (28%). Estimates for the DoD beneficiaries and civilian population indicate a statistically significant moderate protection against overall influenza diagnosis (54%), influenza B (51%), influenza A (any subtype) (45%), A(H1N1) (42%), and A(H3N2) (60%). Mid-season VE estimates for active component service members were higher and statistically significant compared with the previous season.7 This could potentially be due to the 2019–2020 season being more severe and having a higher volume of testing, which resulted in a larger sample size and improved statistical power of the analyses. VE estimates for the DoD beneficiaries and civilian populations were similar to interim estimates from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's VE analysis for the 2019–2020 influenza season.8

There were limitations to these analyses. Results for the active component service member analysis are for medically attended illnesses that were tested for influenza; therefore, the result may not be applicable to less severe illnesses that did not result in a medical encounter for the 2019– 2020 influenza season. Among the active component service member population, influenza vaccination is mandatory, so this population is highly immunized. This could have a negative impact on VE, with potential statistical issues and biological effects such as attenuated immune response with repeated exposures. The DOD beneficiaries and civilians analysis was unable to calculate VE estimates for the elderly population due to insufficient data. Additionally, self-reported data from the questionnaire could result in potential recall bias on the analysis. However, this bias was curtailed for self-reported vaccination status by excluding those whose status could not be ascertained and electronic immunization records were used instead, if available.

Because of the rapidly changing nature of the influenza virus, it is imperative for researchers to continue to assess the effectiveness of the influenza vaccine, as well as to enhance methods of VE analyses for more accurate estimates, and to take waning immunity and repeated vaccinations into account. Future research on these concepts could bring forth benefits and have an influence on decision-making for vaccination policies, especially for the military.

Author affiliations: STS Systems Integration, LLC, San Antonio, TX (Mr. Thervil, Ms. DeMarcus); Wright-Patterson Air Force Base-Air Force satellite, U.S. Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine, Ohio (Mr. Thervil, Ms. DeMarcus); Cherokee Nation Strategic Solutions, Tulsa, OK (Dr. Cost, Ms. Hu); Defense Health Agency, Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division, Silver Spring, MD (Dr. Cost, Ms. Hu); Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, CA (Dr. Myers, Dr. Hollis, Ms. Balansay-Ames, Ms. Ellis, Dr. Christy); General Dynamics Information Technology, San Diego, CA (Ms. Balansay-Ames, Ms. Ellis).

Disclaimer: The authors are military service members or employees of the U.S. Government. This work was prepared as part of their official duties. Title 17, U.S.C. §105 provides that copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the U.S. Government. Title 17, U.S.C. §101 defines a U.S. Government work as work prepared by a military service member or employee of the U.S. Government as part of that person's official duties. Report No. 21-21 was supported by Global Emerging Infections Surveillance & Response System Operations (GEIS) under work unit nos. 60501 and GEIS Promis ID P0151_20_US_01. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, nor the U.S. Government.

References

1. Ho ZJM, Hwang YFJ, Lee JMV. Emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases: challenges and opportunities for militaries. Mil Med Res. 2014;1:21.

2. Sanchez JL, Cooper MJ, Myers CA, et al. Respiratory infections in the U.S. military: recent experience and control. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28(3):743-800.

3. Clarke T Jr. Pandemic, 1918. Mil Med. 2016; 81(8):941-942.

4. Sanchez JL, Cooper MJ. Influenza in the US military: an overview. J Infect Dis Treat. 2016;2:1.

5. Update: pneumonia-influenza and severe acute respiratory illnesses, active component, U.S. Armed Forces, July 2000-June 2012. MSMR. 2012;19:11-13.

6. Toure E, Eick-Cost AA, Hawksworth AW, et al. Brief report: mid-season influenza vaccine effectiveness estimates for the 2016-2017 influenza season. MSMR. 2017;24(8):17-19.

7. Lynch LC, Coleman R, DeMarcus L, et al. Brief report: Department of Defense midseason estimates of vaccine effectiveness for the 2018-2019 influenza season. MSMR. 2019;26(7):24–27. 

8. Dawood FS, Chung JR, Kim SS, et al. Interim estimates of 2019–20 seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness—United States, February 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69:177-182.

TABLE. Mid-season crude and adjusted influenza VE estimates, by influenza subtype and population, 2019–2020 influenza season

You also may be interested in...

Brief Report: The Challenge of Interpreting Repeated Positive Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Among Military Service Members, Fort Jackson, SC, 2020–2021

Article
10/1/2021
An example of a negative rapid test for the SARS-CoV-2 virus (COVID-19). The Texas Military Department has begun distributing rapid COVID-19 tests to its service members across the state as a force health protection measure. This will ensure that the Soldiers and Airmen serving their communities during the COVID-19 pandemic remain healthy and safe. (Photo by ENS Charles E. Spirtos)

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Surveillance Snapshot: History of COVID-19 Vaccination Among Air Force Recruits Arriving at Basic Training, March 2–June 15, 2021

Article
10/1/2021
COVID-19 vaccine bottle and syringes

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Update: Cold Weather Injuries, Active and Reserve Components, U.S. Armed Forces, July 2016–June 2020

Article
10/1/2021
A student participates in a cold-water immersion training at Fort McCoy, Wis., Jan. 17, 2020, as a part of the Cold-Weather Operations Course. (Photo By Scott Sturkol, Army)

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Surveillance Snapshot: Influenza Immunization Among U.S. Armed Forces Health Care Workers, August 2016–April 2021

Article
10/1/2021
Staff Sgt. James H. Wagner, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, vaccinates Maj. Gen. M. Ted Wong, commanding general, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, with the seasonal flu vaccines. All WBAMC beneficiaries are encouraged to get vaccinated against the seasonal flu vaccine and the novel flu virus. Look for flu updates on the WBAMC Facebook page, the All Bliss and the Fort Bliss Monitor. (Photo by SGT Valerie Lopez)

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Update: Routine Screening for Antibodies to Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Civilian Applicants for U.S. Military Service and U.S. Armed Forces, Active and Reserve Components, January 2016–June 2021

Article
9/1/2021
HIV awareness graphic is created on Adobe Photoshop at Fort Carson, Colorado, July 16, 2021. Measures taken to reduce the risk of contracting HIV is abstinence, using condoms while having sex, taking preventative medications, getting tested for HIV or other STDs regularly, and talking to your sexual partners about HIV and STDs. (U.S. Army graphic by Spc. Woodlyne Escarne)

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Is Suicide a Social Phenomenon during the COVID-19 Pandemic? Differences by Birth Cohort on Suicide Among Active Component Army Soldiers, Jan.1, 2000–June 4, 2021

Article
9/1/2021
Spc. Brittney VerBerkmoes speaks among fellow Soldiers in a group centered on finding a way for the Army to mitigate the amount of suicides that occurs among Soldiers. The Solarium was held to help junior service members to communicate with the Army’s senior leaders about finding solutions to important issues occurring in the Army. (U.S. Army photo by Sgt. Elizabeth Rundell)

Is Suicide a Social Phenomenon during the COVID-19 Pandemic? Differences by Birth Cohort on Suicide Among Active Component Army Soldiers, 1 January 2000–4 June 2021

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Surveillance Snapshot: A Simple Model Estimating the Impact of COVID-19 on Lost Duty Days Among U.S. Service Members

Article
9/1/2021
U.S. Navy Hospital Corpsman 2nd Class Julian Gordon, left, a preventative medicine technician with Marine Rotational Force - Darwin, administers a COVID-19 test to a U.S. Marine with MRF-D, at Royal Australian Air Force Base, Darwin, NT, Australia, March 22, 2021. Marines and Sailors with MRF-D are required to conduct strict COVID-19 mitigation procedures prior to arrival in Darwin, in compliance with Northern Territory Health Authorities. All service members must provide three documented negative COVID-19 swab tests throughout their travel and prior to being released from a 14-day quarantine period. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Sgt. Micha Pierce)

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Brief Report: Relationships between Self-reported Psychological Conditions and Aggressive Behaviors Among Crew Members of a U.S. Navy Aircraft Carrier, January 2021

Article
9/1/2021
A U.S. Marine Corps drill instructor with Golf Company, 2nd Recruit Training Battalion, motivates a recruit during a Marine Corps Martial Arts Program (MCMAP) training session at Marine Corps Recruit Depot, San Diego, Aug. 2, 2021. The drill instructors ensured recruits conducted the techniques safely and effectively during the training session. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Zachary T. Beatty)

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Association between Perceived Barriers to Behavioral Health Care and Intentions to Leave the U.S. Army

Article
9/1/2021
U.S. Army Central Reserve component Soldiers swear the oath of enlistment during a mass reenlistment ceremony in celebration of the U.S. Army Reserve 113th birthday at Camp Arifjan, Kuwait, April 23, 2021. This ceremony reaffirms their commitment to the U.S. Army Reserve and the people of the United States. (U.S. Army photo by Sgt. Robert Torres, 203rd Public Affairs Detachment)

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Mental Health Disorders, Behavioral Health Problems, Fatigue and Sleep Outcomes in Remotely Piloted Aircraft/Manned Aircraft Pilots, and Remotely Piloted Aircraft Crew, U.S. Air Force, 1 October 2003–30 June 2019

Article
8/1/2021
U.S. Air Force Capt. Danielle ‘Dani’ Pavone, an MQ-9 pilot with the 110th Wing, speaks during a training scenario through a plexiglass barrier to Staff Sgt. Justin Brandt, an MQ-9 sensor operator at the Battle Creek Air National Guard Base, Battle Creek, Michigan. The plexiglass mitigates risk of coronavirus transmission during the pandemic. (U.S. Air National Guard photo by Staff Sgt. Bethany Rizor)

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Surveillance of Mental and Behavioral Health Care Utilization and Use of Telehealth, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 1 January 2019–30 September 2020

Article
8/1/2021
U.S. Air Force Lt. Col. Eric Oglesbee, the PACAF Pediatric Psychological Developmental Team child psychologist with the 18th Healthcare Operations Squadron, demonstrates how a telehealth appointment would operate at Kadena Air Base, Japan, April 19, 2021. Providing pediatric mental health support to five overseas Air Force bases, P3DT uses both virtual and in-person. (U.S. Air Force photo by Airman 1st Class Anna Nolte)

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Update: Mental Health Disorders and Mental Health Problems, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2016–2020

Article
8/1/2021
 Capt. Elrico Hernandez, battalion physician assistant for 2nd Battalion, 3rd Infantry Regiment, 3rd Stryker Brigade Combat Team, 2nd Infantry Division, discusses a training scenario that is part of the first Primary Care Behavioral Health seminar. The new program is being undertaken by medical care providers throughout United States Division-North in order to provide better mental health screening for Soldiers

Update: Mental Health Disorders and Mental Health Problems, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2016–2020

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Brief Report: Prevalence of Screening Positive for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Among Service Members Following Combat-Related Injury

Article
8/1/2021
U.S. Army Sgt. Arne F. Eastlund of the California Army National Guard’s 49th Military Police Brigade was nearly killed in 2005 in Baghdad, Iraq, during Operation Iraqi Freedom. An improvised explosive device destroyed his military vehicle and killed comrade Sgt. 1st Class Isaac S. Lawson. Eastlund survived and has continued serving Cal Guard even as a retired war veteran. (U.S. Army National Guard photo provided by Arne Eastlund)

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Use, Active Component Service Women, U.S. Armed Forces, 2016–2020

Article
7/1/2021
Lt. Col. Paula Neemann, 15th Healthcare Operations Squadron clinical medicine flight commander, demonstrates several birth options, such as an intrauterine device, at the 15th MDG's contraceptive clinic at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii, May 6, 2021. The contraceptive clinic opened June 7 to service beneficiaries and provide same-day procedures without a referral. (U.S. Air Force photo by 2nd Lt. Benjamin Aronson)

Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Use, Active Component Service Women, U.S. Armed Forces, 2016–2020

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancers, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2007–2019

Article
7/1/2021
Moist snuff, chewing tobacco is placed between cheek and gum. All varieties of smokeless tobacco can cause harmful effects on the oral cavity.

Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancers, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2007–2019

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report
<< < 1 2 3 4 5  ... > >> 
Showing results 1 - 15 Page 1 of 14

DHA Address: 7700 Arlington Boulevard | Suite 5101 | Falls Church, VA | 22042-5101

Some documents are presented in Portable Document Format (PDF). A PDF reader is required for viewing. Download a PDF Reader or learn more about PDFs.